Will Immigration Be the Republican Wedge Issue of 2008?

Is Immigration the New Gay Marriage?

Nithin Coca
By all accounts, we are a nation in turmoil. We continue to fight an never ending war in Iraq, the housing crisis continues to spread throughout the financial markets, and the economy teeters on the edge of recession. To the observer, these are the greatest issues facing America in 2008. Yet, if you listen to the Republicans debate, its as if these issues don't exist. Ignoring the obvious, they ramp up the rhetoric on an different issue, a new scapegoat for all the ills of society. A diversion from the last eight years of failure.

Immigration.

We on the left could dismiss immigration easily. America has greater concerns, and on the issues that matter now, Democrats win, hands down. But when was the last time Republicans ever won on the top issues of the day? Recent election history shows that re-framing the debate through wedge issues has been a winning formula. How many people decided between "you know where I stand" Bush and "flip-flop" Kerry last election on baseless Republican rhetoric? What matters most to America as a whole and what matters Americans at the polls are not the same.

The most contentious moment of the recent CNN/YouTube debate was during the introductory half hour spent solely on Immigration, in which almost every candidate got a say. But Immigration is not only about the 12 million undocumented, but has recently become, to Republicans, the most important issue of national security. Representative Tom Tancredo tied Islamic Terrorism with unsecured borders. Mike Huckabee and Rudy Guiliani debated whether or not educational and health benefits should go to the children of undocumented workers. Mitt Romney railed against sanctuary cities.

One argument goes like this: Immigration didn't work for Republicans in 2006, it didn't work in 2007, why will it work in 2008?
Yet when CNN spends more time in a debate discussing Mitt Romney's yardworkers than the greatest foreign policy disaster since Vietnam, I begin to see images of Willie Horton, of Gay Marriages in San Francisco, of a little girl plucking a flower. As I watch John McCain declare the surge a success and watch Lou Dobbs declare a jihad on Mexicans, I wonder what we'll be talking about in October 2008.

The Republicans are once again beginning to define the debate, and when they define the debate, we lose. From furloughs, to gay marriage to Immigration. Driver's Licenses, Hillary Clinton's most damaging moment in the election. The ugly whisper campaign about Barack Obama's religion and his father. Are these merely a taste of what is to come? And how do we reclaim the debate, and talk about things that matter to Americans - ending the War, Health Care, and the economy.

What do you think? Post your comments below.

Published by Nithin Coca

Born in 1983, Nithin grew up in Kansas, and has a BA in Communication from USC. He currently lives in San Francisco, where he works part time as a Grassroots Media Coordinator for the Sierra, and freelances...  View profile

1 Comments

Post a Comment
  • J. Alec West2/3/2008

    My ex-wife was a legal immigrant, already in the US when we met. After she became a naturalized citizen, we petitioned 4 of her siblings. At the time, the normal petition approval timeframe was 3 years (when petioned by 2 citizens). It took them 6 years. Why? Because, as an immigration officer told us, petition approval numbers are adjusted downward to take the estimated influx of illegals into account. In short, the illegal aliens who waltzed across the border took 3 years of income out of the pockets of my in-laws ... who only wanted to obey the law. Whether it's a Republican wedge issue or not, I'd like to hear how anyone would explain to a legal immigrant petioner how it's OK to send them to the back of the immigration bus to make way for illegals who take the jobs they'd take if they could only get here. Shouldn't all immigrants be treated equally without regard to race, color, creed or national origin ... or are illegal Latinos "better" qualified to be here?

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.