Xerox Phaser 7500 Review

Paul Mann
I love the Xerox company, I really do. However, and this saddens me, I think they dropped the ball a little on the Phaser 7500. Don't get me wrong, it's an impressive machine with some really awesome functions and features. However, if this were up to me, I would be eyeing it's cheaper cousin, the Phaser 7400. At $200 less, with better speeds and a huge finishing tray, you'd be getting more out of it. But, before I go and make your mind up for you, let me explain what the 7500 offers, and what differentiates it from the 7400.

Speed wise, the 7500 has a PPM (pages per minute) rating of 35 for both color and black and white. These are impressive, and what's more, the first page out is about 7 seconds, so don't expect to sit by and wait for this printer to actually move, it will start up faster than lightning.

As for paper size, the highest page size it can fit into it's normal trays is 12x18. For small posters this is a great feature to have. What's more, it can actually do banner printing up to 12.6x47.25, if you load that sized paper into the bypass tray (which isn't very hard to do). With sizes like this, coupled with the low printing costs, you'll rarely have to run out to the print shop to get something copied.

Speaking of bypass tray, most printers that let you print 12x18 force you to do it from the bypass tray. While it is easy to load for a page or two, there are many problems with that. One, paper is easily jammed from the bypass. Two, you can normally only fit a few sheets. Three, since the printer is made to print from the normal trays, it will speed through that paper, but from the bypass you will notice a huge slow down in print time. So allowing you to load such a large sized paper into a normal tray makes the printing easier, faster, and more efficient.

The 7500 also allows you to print on 280gsm paper, or cardstock for the layman. This makes for great in-house business cards, menus, book covers, or anything you need that's thick.

The 7500 also offers booklet printing, scaling, watermarks, run black (meaning that if a color toner runs out, it will keep running and will replace it with black to the best of its ability), color by words (easily lets you modify color from a drop down menu), and great color calibration.

Now, all of this is impressive. But the 7400 does give you higher speeds, let's you do finishing (stapling and 3 or 4 hole punching), and while it lacks a few features will be better for offices. I think this is best for small print shops which are just beginning, or artists, considering all the color options you get. However, the two are very close in price and speeds, so it depends if you want better color, or better finishing.

Published by Paul Mann

I am a full time writer and affiliate blogger. I have had years of printing and writing experience, and love both of these worlds.  View profile

5 Comments

Post a Comment
  • Jane10/5/2010

    We bought the Xerox 7500 (previously had the 7300) and immediately noticed that the paper curls every time. It also won't do the duplexing without jamming. We are currently trying to get a replacement but am afraid the same things will occur.

  • Paul6/30/2010

    We have recently purchased a Xerox 7500 and am very disappointed to discover that this printer uses colour toner even when printing black only. This makes the printer very expensive to run at somewhere around 12 pence per print black only. I have also noticed that although we have currently only printed around 50 colour pages (approx 50% coverage) all colours have dropped by 11% making this printer the most expensive to run I have ever come across at around £1.20 a print!

  • Kim1/26/2010

    I am getting terrible results from a brand new xerox 7500. I have never seen anything like this and cannot get help from xerox to determine the problem.
    Anyone have ideas about this and where to get help. Not a hardware problem according to a technician.

  • Paul Mann11/18/2009

    Please note that writers are not in control of what ads are placed on their article, nor where, nor what size. Associated Content is responsible for this ad placement, so if there is an issue I think it would be best to forward it to them.

  • sal11/18/2009

    cant read the article because your stupid add in blocking the text. frusstrating ,so will not these any further!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.