Your Tax Dollars at Work - Are You Interested in Knowing Where Your Tax Dollars Go?

ZZ Thompson
When the luminary on the radio said that we needed to move on and not find scapegoats in the aftermath of the current financial meltdown I have to say I was initially quite convinced by what I heard. It was important, the luminary said, to look forward and not backward, and to not demonize hardworking people. Quite right too, I thought. It is much better to focus on the future rather than the distant past.

Then I glanced at the news, and saw a few column inches, not many in comparison with the fulsome coverage given to the OctoMom, but a few, discussing the latest problem to have befallen a bank.

On this occasion the problem had a slightly different twist. This was not a case of investing in borrowers with insufficient income to repay a loan, or gambling with credit default swaps. This was merely a question of the apportioning of holiday bonuses.

Clearly organizations like banks are unashamedly sales based, similar in many ways to used car lots, though not as honorable. This particular organization had put together a sales incentive plan which involved large compensation packages going to executives at the end of the year in 2008, despite the company as a whole having wracked up crippling losses for their investors. Additionally, to add insult to grievous financial injury, the organization concerned promptly required a government backed rescue by another bank. However, the bonuses paid out to executives of the failing company, on the basis of their huge annual loss, were $3.6bn dollars.

Now when you spread out $3.6bn among many people your money does not go all that far. If, for example, you have a million recipients, each would receive 3.6 thousand dollars. Many people would be happy to receive such a sum of money, and likely there are many, many people in the world who could acquit themselves as well as these sterling professionals at the task of running a formerly successful financial organization into bankruptcy.

However, interestingly, there were far fewer than 1 million executives who divided the $3.6bn. Precisely how many has not yet been divulged, as unsurprisingly, there seems to be a degree of reticence as to who the actual recipients were. Prior to its demise, the failed sales organization employed a total of around 60,000 people. So, assuming each person in the company had been an executive, each would have received $60k, more than a typical teacher's annual salary, as a year end bonus in 2008, having bankrupted their company.

But, more than likely, the largesse was not evenly distributed among the employees and instead a relatively small number of 'seasoned professionals' walked away from the collapse with extraordinarily well provisioned nest eggs, a few small, medium and large islands, and their children's education and legal fees covered for generations.

Say for example there were 60 recipients of the $3.6bn, each on average would have taken possession of $60m. Or if there were 600 recipients, it would be $6m each, if it were 6 executives, each would have ended the year with a much needed $600m fillip. It is fun to do the division. (I continue to fear that the moderately large numbers involved effectively cloak the financial wizardry from both politicians, who count only as far as registered voter numbers and citizens, who count only as far as the number of days to the next pay check).

However, given the bonus bonanza to the end of a loss making year, and the indications of management effectiveness that this portrays, the demise of the bank can hardly be a surprise to many in the financial world.

But, perhaps those dupes who end up paying the final tab can be forgiven for being a little surprised. Those bill payers are, in large part, owing to the TARP legislation, ordinary tax payers.

The tax-payer bailout money, to the tune of many billions of dollars went to Bank of America, who needed that money to support the ailing Merrill-Lynch, the sales organization that so handsomely rewarded its failed sales executives.

Once more an organization's executives have separated many customers from their commissions, many investors from their 401k's, and many tax payers from their tax dollars, laughing all the way to the Bank of America. (As it were).

I therefore cannot agree with the luminary. If tax payers, investors, legislators, and executives do not examine what happened, make corrections, and learn lessons, these circumstances will be repeated indefinitely.

There will always be a fear that unscrupulousness is the norm and any form of investment unwise unless the lessons are learned. That fear will undoubtedly stunt the world's economies. Where executives, auditors, and rating agencies signed off on accounts which were palpably incorrect, laws and penalties should be applied, and appropriate fines and punishment administered, and the excess money should be returned to tax payers.

Personally, I do not favor jail time for financial wrong doers in addition to repayment of ill gotten gains. This after all would cost tax payers hundred of thousands of dollars more per conviction per year (as incarceration is a costly undertaking) and would contravene an important rule of capitalism and common sense: don't throw good money after bad. However, a productive and vigorous contribution to the Peace Corps, building hospitals in Afghanistan, Darfur, Sudan, or Gaza, would provide a wonderful opportunity to give back to society. Far better than setting up innumerable charitable foundations which continue to separate money from the needy, less temptation to engage in tax efficiency 'schemes', wonderful exercise, and an opportunity to see the world.

Of course, these business dealings may have been the entirely legitimate and routine transactions of well educated and sophisticated financial wizards. A thorough and public investigation would allow this to be assessed. Far from looking backward this would seem to be basic common sense.

Source

Associated Press, 'Cuomo, Frank pressure BofA to disclose bonus info', http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6301219.html

2 Comments

Post a Comment
  • ZZ Thompson3/22/2009

    Well - I hope that the packaged mortgaged 'products' were not constructed on the basis that no mortgages would ever default. If that was the case then the Wall St. whiz kids should certainly consider taking slightly smaller bonuses. Normally a percentage of mortgages default every year, and there is a system for repossessing and selling the resulting foreclosed houses. Currently the percentage of failed mortgages is higher than normal - but there should be plenty of appraisers and real estate agents available to value and sell those houses to other buyers, and allow the mortgage owners to collect back their money. Perhaps these properties should be the investment vehicle of choice for Wall St. whiz kids? (They could then benefit from tax payer bailouts again - it has been a few weeks since they received their last government checks or cheques).

  • Jack Heath3/17/2009

    What no-one seems to face up to is the fact that much of the problem is wrapped up in the non-performing mortgages. These are at the back of the weird derivatives which have been bought, sold, insured, repackaged, rebought resold reinsured etc ad inf. Someone has to extract each mortgage, find out if it is performing, if it isn't sell the property on which it is secured, or find a way of making the borrower start repaying. Once the mortgage is turned to cash, claims can be made up the chain of derivatives etc, so the various claimants get something. They might even be interested in taking the property. Of course, this might lead to a "fire sale" situation, so some claimants may wish to hold properties & release them on to the market slowly.
    But ultimately someone has to check those mortgage loans and their security. A long and tedious job for a knowledgeable professional, who will want, and will deserve a good salary package. It might be a good way of getting otherwise unemployed CPAs

Displaying Comments

To comment, please sign in to your Yahoo! account, or sign up for a new account.